Talk:Adventure Bots! Part 2 - Revision history

Ascent: Added stamp

Ascent — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:16:16 GMT

Added stamp

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 22 April 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	[[User:Will\|"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds]] 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Will\|"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds]] 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

-	The article says "in line with their programming where possible" under the "Independent Robot Actions" subheading.	+	The article says "in line with their programming where possible" under the "Independent Robot Actions" subheading.[[User:Ascent\|Ascent]] 23:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Ascent: Answering a question.

Ascent — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:15:49 GMT

Answering a question.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 22 April 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	[[User:Will\|"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds]] 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Will\|"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds]] 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	The article says "in line with their programming where possible" under the "Independent Robot Actions" subheading.

Will at 01:17, 13 April 2010

Will — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:17:36 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 13 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, C.J., when you say a robot can defend itself or others independent of orders, is that with or in spite of, the Attack/Defense program given in the AD rules?		So, C.J., when you say a robot can defend itself or others independent of orders, is that with or in spite of, the Attack/Defense program given in the AD rules?
		+
		+	Just curious.
		+
		+	Will

	[[User:Will\|"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds]] 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)		[[User:Will\|"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds]] 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Will: Created page with 'So, C.J., when you say a robot can defend itself or others independent of orders, is that with or in spite of, the Attack/Defense program given in the AD rules? ~~~~'

Will — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:16:43 GMT

Created page with 'So, C.J., when you say a robot can defend itself or others independent of orders, is that with or in spite of, the Attack/Defense program given in the AD rules? ~~~~'

New page

So, C.J., when you say a robot can defend itself or others independent of orders, is that with or in spite of, the Attack/Defense program given in the AD rules?

[[User:Will|"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds]] 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)