Talk:Adventure Bots! Part 2
From Star Frontiers Network
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with 'So, C.J., when you say a robot can defend itself or others independent of orders, is that with or in spite of, the Attack/Defense program given in the AD rules? ~~~~') |
(Added stamp) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, C.J., when you say a robot can defend itself or others independent of orders, is that with or in spite of, the Attack/Defense program given in the AD rules? | So, C.J., when you say a robot can defend itself or others independent of orders, is that with or in spite of, the Attack/Defense program given in the AD rules? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Just curious. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Will | ||
[[User:Will|"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds]] 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Will|"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds]] 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The article says "in line with their programming where possible" under the "Independent Robot Actions" subheading.[[User:Ascent|Ascent]] 23:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 23:16, 22 April 2010
So, C.J., when you say a robot can defend itself or others independent of orders, is that with or in spite of, the Attack/Defense program given in the AD rules?
Just curious.
Will
"So no more running. I aim to misbehave."—Malcolm Reynolds 01:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
The article says "in line with their programming where possible" under the "Independent Robot Actions" subheading.Ascent 23:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
